In an effort to "market" BlackBox it would be useful to me to know of all of you
in the USA who are using BlackBox. If you would be so kind, please post your name
so we can form a USA group. No commitment to do anything at this time.
I just want to establish the group and see what happens.
-Doug Danforth
USA users of BlackBox
- DGDanforth
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 1:16 am
- Location: Palo Alto, CA, U.S.A.
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2018 2:07 am
Re: USA users of BlackBox
Lance Schwerdfager ... I'm actually Canadian but that should be sufficiently close to qualify.
- adimetrius
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2019 1:02 pm
Re: USA users of BlackBox
Lance, Could you share how you use BB?lschwerdfager wrote: ↑Fri Jul 08, 2022 3:53 am Lance Schwerdfager ... I'm actually Canadian but that should be sufficiently close to qualify.
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2018 2:07 am
Re: USA users of BlackBox

The reason I chose these two projects is because I wanted to respectively implement a practical application that is based on on a minimum heap data structure and then another based on an AVL tree. Being able to implement persistent objects by inheriting from Stores.Store renders use of a third party DBMS completely unnecessary.
I would be very interested in participating in a project of reasonable size that might have some real commercial potential. I haven't been able to identify any such project anywhere and am amazed that is the case. As we all know, BlackBox Component Builder is a fabulous development environment that, together with Component Pascal, has tremendous potential. Why things seem to have been overshadowed by Java, C#, etc., thus keeping that potential unrealized, is beyond me. It must only be because these languages are keeping the C legacy alive.