Search found 28 matches
- Sun Feb 25, 2018 4:18 pm
- Forum: Feature
- Topic: An inspiration for the next generation BBox kernel
- Replies: 1
- Views: 10285
An inspiration for the next generation BBox kernel
Hi All, I came across this PhD written by Florian Negele at ETHZ: https://www.research-collection.ethz.ch/bitstream/handle/20.500.11850/154828/eth-47094-02.pdf He approached the cooperative multitasking in a very interesting way by combining it with a lock-free programing. Just curious if this could...
- Wed Feb 21, 2018 11:09 am
- Forum: Ctls
- Topic: Progress Bar Inspector (ex. Ctls issues)
- Replies: 3
- Views: 20356
Progress Bar Inspector (ex. Ctls issues)
Hi, I have moved to the latest stable release of the framework (1.7.1 /1014). I have installed the Ctls component. I have observed that after adding a progress bar into my application (or even inserting it anywhere), I cannot change its properties using properties inspector. It does not start "...
- Wed Dec 13, 2017 7:45 am
- Forum: Coco/R
- Topic: Strange behaviour of Coco/R
- Replies: 10
- Views: 29052
Re: Strange behaviour of Coco/R
The installation command in the CPC package does not include recompiling CocoCRTasks etc. If you want to recompile everything in subsystem Coco you can use the command (!)DevCompiler.CompileSubs Coco ~ or you can recompile the missing files (CocoCRTasks, CocoCRCmds, CocoTextsOV4) one by one. - Jose...
- Mon Dec 11, 2017 8:04 pm
- Forum: Coco/R
- Topic: Strange behaviour of Coco/R
- Replies: 10
- Views: 29052
Re: Strange behaviour of Coco/R
Sorry, I don't understand the problem. I install Coco on 1.7-a1 and it works I install Coco on the 1.7.1-rc1 and it works - Helmut I did the following experiment: - Completely fresh installation of 1.7.1-rc1 on a different machine without any other components installed (Win7, x64) - Coco/R from Hel...
- Sun Dec 10, 2017 10:44 am
- Forum: Coco/R
- Topic: Strange behaviour of Coco/R
- Replies: 10
- Views: 29052
Re: Strange behaviour of Coco/R
Module CocoCRTasks is a custom interface. Coco provides a template only. You have overwritten and destroy Coco with your project. Coco itself uses CocoTasks. There are your missing procedures. Solution: Unpack Coco from the save set and reinstall Coco via the Quick-Start instruction. - Helmut Hi He...
- Sun Dec 10, 2017 9:55 am
- Forum: Coco/R
- Topic: Strange behaviour of Coco/R
- Replies: 10
- Views: 29052
Re: Strange behaviour of Coco/R
Hi Ivan,Ivan Denisov wrote:Did you compile both Coco/R separately for both installations of BlackBox?
Yes. I did compile Coco/R on each system separately.
Regards,
Darek
- Sat Dec 09, 2017 8:27 pm
- Forum: Coco/R
- Topic: Strange behaviour of Coco/R
- Replies: 10
- Views: 29052
Strange behaviour of Coco/R
Hi All, I am in the process of transition from the BBox 1.7-a1 to the BBox 1.7.1-rc1 environment. I have installed the Coco/R - Compiler-Compiler V2.2-9 on both systems. On version 1.7-a1 everything works fine. During my experiments I have encounter a problem with the Coco/R on the 1.7.1-rc1. It com...
- Wed Dec 07, 2016 8:29 pm
- Forum: BlackBox Framework
- Topic: Heap limit
- Replies: 12
- Views: 31312
Re: Heap limit
Hi Robert, Yes, I meant the status bar at the bottom. I ran your program, and on my machine I got on average 58 to 61 blobs allocated (61 for a single mode). It seems that the garbage collect does the job between runs, and heap into at the bottom is not updated immediately. Still, the reason for suc...
- Mon Dec 05, 2016 8:40 pm
- Forum: BlackBox Framework
- Topic: Heap limit
- Replies: 12
- Views: 31312
Re: Heap limit
... just checked BBox 1.6 and the result is:
nof allocated 10MB blocks: 139
So, it could something magic about the version I am using.
Cheers,
Darek
nof allocated 10MB blocks: 139
So, it could something magic about the version I am using.
Cheers,
Darek
- Mon Dec 05, 2016 8:30 pm
- Forum: BlackBox Framework
- Topic: Heap limit
- Replies: 12
- Views: 31312
Re: Heap limit
Hi Josef,
the results of running your test program is:
nof allocated 10MB blocks: 67
which is roughly similar to the results I got with small blocks. Could be something about my version of the BBox system?
I am running 1.7-a1 Build:480, 2016.03.22.
Cheers,
Darek
the results of running your test program is:
nof allocated 10MB blocks: 67
which is roughly similar to the results I got with small blocks. Could be something about my version of the BBox system?
I am running 1.7-a1 Build:480, 2016.03.22.
Cheers,
Darek